I Am Done With It

[Anonymous Coward]

Yes Darlings, you see this right, I know, shocker, someone actually mailed us …after frau Regine it is the first one, with some links and clue …gold nuggets…it is interesting as it builds up the case more many tiny pebbles can also be very heavy …if you have enough of them…It reminds me of the Regine screenshot of Diana crying for help from Debess,obviously ignored by Jo Leigh, naturally, but it was a good catch.
Anyway, unlike Diana, we show where we got our info from and do not pass it off as if it were us doing it.. oh that hurt....I do have a vague clue who it might be but there were a few in that category , interviewed twice or , at least, maybe one interview used again later in a new frame....whatever it may be....you have to be rather simple and silly to still believe in the hype from texas at this point duhhh.

2026-08-29 19_18_34-Re_ Maybe best use this one - Message (HTML).jpg (134.74 KiB) Viewed 19 times

The copyright issue i think should be pointed out.



April 24, 2021 – apparent sibling/probate post: Someone claiming to be Alan Watt’s UK sibling said their brother had died in Sudbury the previous month, that a woman claimed to be his common-law wife, that they believed there was no will, and that they had contacted a Canadian probate specialist. The post links Alan Watt’s exact business profile, strongly tying it to CTTM.

https://www.justanswer.co.uk/law/gnfu1- ... ry-uk.html

2026-08-18-20_20_49-Our-brother-died-last-month-in-Sudbury.-We-are-in-the-UK-and-have-just-found-out.jpg (105.05 KiB) Viewed 22 times

2026-08-18-20_20_55-Our-brother-died-last-month-in-Sudbury.-We-are-in-the-UK-and-have-just-found-out.jpg (40.41 KiB) Viewed 22 times

2026-08-18-20_21_02-Our-brother-died-last-month-in-Sudbury.-We-are-in-the-UK-and-have-just-found-out.jpg (77.19 KiB) Viewed 22 times

Ask an Expert
Law

Ask a Law Question, Get an Answer ASAP!

Ask an Expert
Ask a Solicitor
Our brother died last month in Sudbury. We are in the UK and
Our brother died last month in Sudbury. We are in the UK and have just found out. We can’t get solid answers from a person who claims to be his Common Law wife.
He has a business that we believe has a $4m turnover.
We need help.
We believe he did not leave a will.
JA: Where are you? It matters because laws vary by location.
Customer: We are in England but he lived in Ontario for 40+ years
JA: What steps have you taken so far?
Customer: We have contacted the Consular services as we believe he is still a UK citizen and they are trying to contact the local police to find out the details of his passing.
JA: Is there anything else the Lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured that they’ll be able to help you.
Customer: No. That is as much as we know. This link is where I found the turnover information. https://www.zoominfo.com/c/alan-watt/352067970
Share this conversation


Answered in 20 minutes by:
24/4/2021
Lawyer: MarianC
MarianC
MarianC, Solicitor
Category: Law
Satisfied Customers: 1,277
Experience: 20 years experience in Wills and Probates and Trusts
Verified
Good evening, thank you for your question, I am sorry to hear of your situation. Do you mean that your brother died in Sudbury in England?

Kind regards

Marian

Ask Your Own Law Question
No. Sudbury Ontario Canada

Lawyer: MarianC
Thank you, ***** ***** be that he will be treated as domiciled in Canada unless he retained any UK assets.

Ask Your Own Law Question

Lawyer: MarianC
Good morning, do you need any further assistance? Have you obtained any further information?

Ask Your Own Law Question
Hi Marian
I have contacted a probate specialist in Canada. It’s a complicated situation which needs local knowledge.

Lawyer: MarianC
Thank you, ***** ***** me again if you need any assistance on the UK probate side.

Kind regards

Marian

Ask Your Own Law Question
MarianC
MarianC, Solicitor
1,277 Satisfied Customers
20 years experience in Wills and Probates and Trusts
MarianC is online now!

Continue

Share this conversation

UK Probate Law for Overseas Estates Without a Will
Unclear inheritance rights and difficulties verifying estate details often cause delays.

When a relative dies abroad without a will, UK heirs must navigate both local and UK probate laws. Confirm the deceased’s domicile and citizenship status, as this affects jurisdiction. Obtain official death records through consular or local authorities. Identify all assets, including business interests, and gather financial documents. Applying for a grant of probate or letters of administration may require legal advice to clarify rights, especially if a common law partner claims interest. Seek guidance from UK probate specialists or official government resources to ensure lawful estate administration.

Disclaimer: This information is AI-generated and intended for informational purposes only. For accurate diagnostics and repairs, please speak to an expert at Justanswer before taking any action.

Early post-death copyright wording: An archived CTTM page from August 2021 shows CTTM initially separating its new Redux copyright from Alan’s original material: “© CTTM May 9, 2021” while still stating “Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt.”

https://archive.ph/Gs4Gc



There also transcripts which have Texas address to it. Dating back to 2020. Which may even suggest Alan was aware of this changes but ofocurse that has probably been updated recently.

I started turning away after all the “guests” on the channel.

Sure I was up there 2 times but never felt I had anything to offer.

Now it feels like a person wanting to create contents.

She reached out to me for more but I’m done with it.

[Anonymous Coward]

The fuller picture we were discussing was something like this:

We stumbled onto this old lawyer exchange and suddenly got a little window into the family immediately after Alan’s death. Not the polished version that came later, but apparently a rather bewildered group of relatives in Britain trying to work out what on earth had happened.

They say, essentially:

Our brother has died in Canada. We only just found out. We don’t have solid answers. There is some woman claiming to be his common-law wife. We don’t know whether he left a will. We don’t even have the details of his death. And apparently he has some business that might be worth millions. What do we do?

That is a very different atmosphere from the later picture of everything being neatly understood and handled.

And the human element is precisely what struck us.

These don’t sound like relatives who had a close, intimate knowledge of Alan’s life. They sound like people who had lost touch with their brother over decades and were suddenly confronted with an unfamiliar world around him.

Which connects with that old description you brought up — “our silly brother in Canada.” The impression is of someone who had become rather remote from the family, not someone whose daily life they knew intimately.

Then suddenly: this mysterious woman is apparently claiming to be his partner.

And the family’s reaction isn’t:

“Yes, of course, that’s Alan’s wife.”

It’s:

“a person who claims to be his Common Law wife.”

That little phrase is loaded. It tells us how the relationship was perceived at that moment: unverified, unfamiliar, something they needed to investigate.

Then comes the almost absurdly mundane part: the money.

They’ve found ZoomInfo. They see a business apparently associated with Alan. Someone has interpreted <$5M as “$4m turnover.” And now they’re asking a lawyer how they can deal with the estate.

So you get this rather extraordinary human tableau:

Brother they’ve barely been in contact with → dies in Canada → mysterious woman appears → family doesn’t know whether she’s legitimate → they don’t know about a will → they don’t know exactly what happened to him → there’s supposedly a substantial business → everyone starts scrambling for lawyers and information.

And that is why the artifact felt like such a good catch.

It doesn’t teach you the basic conclusion. You already had that.

It gives the conclusion a little bit more human texture.

And then there is the other artifact you mentioned — Diana contacting Debess after discovering that M wasn’t what she believed her to be.

Put those side by side and you get two completely different people, in two different circles, apparently experiencing versions of the same basic phenomenon:

“Wait. Something about this story isn’t what I thought it was.”

That’s much more interesting than a sterile list of discrepancies.

And then there’s the slightly dark comedy of the whole thing: Alan disappears from the scene, and suddenly everybody has a different relationship to the vacuum he left behind — family trying to understand the estate, people around CTTM trying to establish control, old associates becoming unwelcome, and competing narratives beginning to crystallize.

That’s the human story underneath the paperwork.

Well that was the AI version of it … as it was a lengthy discussion, it went a lot more deep and nasty but we spare you the gory details and just the brushed up version…

So, in human words, his family , well it is obvious most of them could not care less about Alan, there was some contact but not much, the once a year christmas card , they obviously had not a clue there was someone there, in whatever form, also it is obvious they went for the cash, that was the first thing , not a beep about anything else, also the timelines are cute, so it must have been quite a while later that they were contacted, thus, giving Frau M plenty of time to do damage control, cleaning up, bla bla , the usual…. tidying up lose ends shall we say.. ship off his stuff to texas and so forth and so on….

Also, children, it shows it was written by a man, also judging by the style, an older man, so it is an older man who has written the post, who could that be, probably our Frank Kerr…

Also it shows they did not have a clue about the business of Alan, all quite remarkable..it means the contact was very distant. Certainly not the ” close contact” as Elizabeth Kerr tries to make out.
That is obviously wrong.

Also, in case you are still with it all, darlings, if you think a bit deeper, can you do that , I teased AI but it failed hahaah , it did not grasp it, the clue is of course that there now must be an official document, a death certificate, for some mysterious reason or just plain stupidity, Diana , who talked with the bunch in Scotland ” forgot” to ask for that ? Make of that what you will. So we know the family must have a death certificate, maybe Diana can try again ? If they refuse to show it , it would be another red flag, we got plenty of those now.

And that is probably the reason the family chose a nitwit like Diana to interact , as she never asks questions you see, like I would.

Can I see some proof please ?

Any sort of proof, if not certificate maybe something else, some correspondence with a law office in Canada, whatever it may be , but you get the point.
Some sort of fact not just silly drivel.

It is obvious from the obsession the family has with that stupid Cuttingthroughthematrix crap , that whatever ” it is” , there is obviously something rather big connected to it , duhhhhhh..no brainer..game is on for five years now, so it must be ” substantial” no idea how that money got there, maybe this truther business is indeed a business..nobody knows

That is why they have to have it and that is why this will never be solved, or not soon, not because M wants the cash, she never gets that , but she wants to wear them down – block access- and that might just work as at some point the family has to cave in or spend another decade with nothing…as the case is already ongoing for five years or so…so the family has to bribe her out , pay her off and let her have cttm, maybe not the whole account associated with it , but think M would love a good cut, not a stupid pathetic stipend, nope…and if the sisters refuse to pay her off the get rid of her, well than the case keeps getting stalled for a long time and as they are both rather nasty characters both will not give in easily so it can last a while..so it seems we have to endure our tin pot guru in Keene for a while longer..sorry for that…

So the cleanup crew had done its work , AW is history and all covered up, neatly and clean. Was that her real role … makes you wonder eh ?

Should make you go hmmm…of course person X here, well did not want to act like a jester …..to please M s needs for entertainment and clout…as the whole ” work” has turned into a circus , Alan always warned us for that, counter intelligence, make it all into a circus , spin it of into lala land…etc..and yes , that is exactly what has happened.

Also I did verify the evidence, trying to recreate it and it is rather easy to find but I was stupid hahaha, it was so simple , I only had to use different search terms and it did show in my search results, I should have found it myself so you see nobody is perfect..

Also you see the date, ” we just found out” , well ehhh duhhh… that is april 24th … alan died march 4th …I do not know are we missing something ? Did it take M 5…6…weeks …to inform them ? Makes you wonder , does it not ? Food for thought.

Yes Dual copyright, Regine pointed that out too, but noticed it as well to muddy the water later …

Buying her time to do some finishing up … brush off some things…do a few ..hmm adjustments…here and there…and buy the time the family get things moving which will take months in such cases , Queen bee is chilling in Texas…. pushing around her workerbees Debess and Kevin ….if she is so poor where does she get all the bucks from to pay those lawyers ? Food for thought , children..

Or…ship Alan´s crappy rusty shitty car over to TX duhhhh… food for thought, little ones… food for thought..
What must that have cost ? Why ?
And than beg to Diana for a new pc , wow, she has true talents , our lady M … but only an idiot would fall for it.

jester-jester-and-queen (1).gif (168.7 KiB) Viewed 21 times